The truth of things and morality SzD-DNT>Prarz
Within classical metaphysics, we are dealing with the truth of things, which allows us to understand the intention of the creator of a given thing (res) as content, which must be taken into account within the framework of fundamental moral reasoning, the practical syllogism. However, in the history of philosophy, classical metaphysics was abandoned and replaced by ontology. The difference between the two sciences is fundamental: metaphysics is the exploration of the internal structure of reality, including the intention of its creator or Creator, while ontology is a reflection on the conditions for the existence of a given thing a priori and based on human reason. In practice, ontology often involves inventing reality and imposing a new understanding on an already existing reality. Gender ideology is a case in point. The basis for this new approach (in relation to classical metaphysics) is Kant's thesis on the unknowability of things in themselves. This new approach also justifies ethical pluralism.
Course coordinators
(in Polish) Tryb zajęć
Learning outcomes
The student knows and understands the fundamental philosophical and anthropological dilemmas of contemporary civilization (K_W05). He knows and understands the difference between epistemological realism and idealism. Understands the difference between classical metaphysics and ontology (K_W03) and understands the influence of both sciences on ethical imperatives (K_W06).
The student Is able to independently plan their own development and inspire the development of others in matters related to the lecture – the influence of philosophical thinking on the perception of the world around us (K_U02). The student is able to participate in the exchange of experiences and ideas, including within the scientific community (K_U03). He is also able to disseminate research results, initiate debate, and participate in scientific discourse, including in an international environment (K_U06).
The student is ready to recognize the importance of moral knowledge in solving practical problems (K_K03). Is ready to think and act in an innovative and inspiring way (K_K05). He is ready to conduct research independently, guided by objective truth rather than generally accepted stereotypes and thought patterns (K_K06).
Assessment criteria
Lecture. Assessment based on an essay prepared by the students based on the lecture and the main work that served as the basis for the lecture.
Practical placement
Lack.
Bibliography
T. Kraj, Katolik wobec pluralizm etycznego na przykładzie bioetyki, Kraków 2023.
J. Pieper, Reality and the Good, [w:] J. Pieper, Living the Truth, San Francisco 1989, s.107-179.
J. Pieper, The Truth of All Things, [w:] J. Pieper, Living the Truth, San Francisco 1989, s.5-106.
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: