Academic writing SzD-DF>(1)Acawri
Academic writing classes serve to prepare PhD students for their own scientific work and publish the results obtained. Doctoral students will learn about the current requirements for scientific publications. The emphasis will be put on preparing publications intended for prestigious journals or publishing houses. Participants will therefore become familiar with the principles and practice of international publishing.
Much attention will be paid to the appropriate substantive and editorial preparation of the publication.
The classes take the form of workshops during which a project (article, chapter, etc.) is prepared. This paper can then be submitted for publication.
|
W cyklu 2022/2023-Z:
1. Introduction to academic writing& publishing |
Tryb zajęć
Koordynatorzy przedmiotu
Efekty kształcenia
KW_06 Uczestnik zna i rozumie zasady upowszechniania wyników naukowych, w szczególności w formie artykułów. Zna zasady Open Access i wie jak sprawdzić politykę dostępu czasopism.
K_U03 Uczestnik potrafi uczestniczyć w międzynarodowej wymianie doświadczeń poprzez umiejętność zgłoszenia swej pracy do publikacji w czasopismach międzynarodowych
K_K01 Uczestnik jest gotów do niezależnego badania powiększającego istniejący dorobek naukowy poprzez znajomość zasad publikacji
K_K06 Uczestnik jest gotów do podtrzymania i rozwijania etosu środowisk badawczych poprzez znajomość podstawowych zasad etyki publikacji
Kryteria oceniania
• Attendance is mandatory.
• Grading on a base of own's outline of the paper (60%) and Zotero citation homework (40%)
• There will be no penalty for the late work.
• Student's activity during the class as well the discussion of the paper may raise one's grade.
Zotero citation homework grading criteria:
1. Paper has to reference to more than 10 publications (including more than 2 internet sources)
2. Properly used references [max. 30 points]
3. Typography [max. points ]
4. Quality of bibliographical data [max. points]
Total max 100 points (100%).
Outline of the paper have to consist on:
1. Properly formulated title of academic paper (max. 10 points)
2. Abstract in English (max. 30 points)
3. Keywords in English (max. 5 points)
4. Description of paper structure (max. 30 points)
5. Bibliography in Zotero (max. 15 points)
6. Two journal titles taken into consideration for publication with the argumentation for this selection (max. 10 points)
Total max 100 points (100%).
**Grading**
5.0 [more than 90%]
Mastery of course content at the highest level of attainment that can reasonably be expected of students at a given stage of development. This grade states clearly that the student has shown such outstanding promise in the aspect of the discipline under study that he/she may be strongly encouraged to continue.
4.5 [more or equal to 80% and less than 90%]
Strong performance demonstrating a high level of attainment for a student at a given stage of development. The 4.5 grade states that the student has shown solid promise in the aspect of the discipline under study.
4.0 [more or equal to 70% and less than 80%]
A totally acceptable performance demonstrating an adequate level of attainment for a student at a given stage of development. The 4.0 grade states that while not yet showing any unusual promise, the student may continue to study in the discipline with reasonable hope of intellectual development.
3.5 [more or equal to 60% and less than 70%]
Performance higer than marginal, however not totally acceptable for an adequate level of attainment for a student at a given stage of development. The 3.5 grade states that the student may give some prospective groth in the discipline but he/she need change learning methods or/and increasing learning efforts.
3.0 [more than 50% and less than 60%]
A marginal performance in the required exercises demonstrating a minimal passing level of attainment for a student at a given stage of development. The 3.0 grade states that the student has given no evidence of prospective growth in the discipline; an accumulation of 3.0 grades should be taken to mean that the student would be well advised not to continue in the academic field.
2.0 [less than or equal to 50%]
For whatever reasons, an unacceptable performance. This grade indicates that
the student’s performance in the required exercises has revealed almost no
understanding of the course content. A grade of 2.0 should warrant questioning whether the student may suitably register for further study in the discipline before remedial work is undertaken.
Literatura
1. A Guide to Philosophical Writing by Elijah Chudnoff.
http://isites.harvard.edu/k24101
2. Borja, Angel. “11 Steps to Structuring a Science Paper Editors Will Take Seriously.” Elsevier Connect, July 11, 2019. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/11-steps-to-structuring-a-science-paper-editors-will-take-seriously.
Supplementary literature:
1. Polak, Paweł, Hanna Michalczyk, and Małgorzata Stawarz. Wprowadzenie do pracy naukowej w filozofii: podręcznik do zajęć “Metodyka pracy naukowej i obsługi komputera” na kierunku filozofia. Podręczniki OBI. Kraków: Ośrodek Badań Interdyscyplinarnych-Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Papieskiego Jana Pawła II, 2012.
2. Heller, Michał. Jak być uczonym. Edited by Małgorzata Szczerbińska-Polak. Kraków: Znak, 2009.
|
W cyklu 2022/2023-Z:
1. Zotero Quick Start Guide: https://www.zotero.org/support/quick_start_guide |
Więcej informacji
Dodatkowe informacje (np. o kalendarzu rejestracji, prowadzących zajęcia, lokalizacji i terminach zajęć) mogą być dostępne w serwisie USOSweb: