Academic writing SzD-DF>(1)Acawri-ć

KW_06 Uczestnik zna i rozumie zasady upowszechniania wyników naukowych, w szczególności w formie artykułów. Zna zasady Open Access i wie jak sprawdzić politykę dostępu czasopism.
K_U03 Uczestnik potrafi uczestniczyć w międzynarodowej wymianie doświadczeń poprzez umiejętność zgłoszenia swej pracy do publikacji w czasopismach międzynarodowych
K_K01 Uczestnik jest gotów do niezależnego badania powiększającego istniejący dorobek naukowy poprzez znajomość zasad publikacji
K_K06 Uczestnik jest gotów do podtrzymania i rozwijania etosu środowisk badawczych poprzez znajomość podstawowych zasad etyki publikacji

• Attendance is mandatory.
• Grading on a base of own's outline of the paper (60%) and Zotero citation homework (40%)
• There will be no penalty for the late work.
• Student's activity during the class as well the discussion of the paper may raise one's grade.

Zotero citation homework grading criteria:
1. Paper has to reference to more than 10 publications (including more than 2 internet sources)
2. Properly used references [max. 30 points]
3. Typography [max.30 points ]
4. Quality of bibliographical data [max. 40 points]
Total max 100 points (100%).

Outline of the paper have to consist on:
1. Properly formulated title of academic paper (max. 10 points)
2. Abstract in English (max. 30 points)
3. Keywords in English (max. 5 points)
4. Description of paper structure (max. 30 points)
5. Bibliography in Zotero (max. 15 points)
6. Two journal titles taken into consideration for publication with the argumentation for this selection (max. 10 points)

Total max 100 points (100%).

Grading

5.0 Mastery of course content at the highest level of attainment that can reasonably be expected of students at a given stage of development. This grade states clearly that the student has shown such outstanding promise in the aspect of the discipline under study that he/she may be strongly encouraged to continue. [more than 90%]

4.5 Strong performance demonstrating a high level of attainment for a student at a given stage of development. The 4.5 grade states that the student has shown solid promise in the aspect of the discipline under study.
[more or equal to 80% and less than 90%]

4.0 A totally acceptable performance demonstrating an adequate level of attainment for a student at a given stage of development. The 4.0 grade states that while not yet showing any unusual promise, the student may continue to study in the discipline with reasonable hope of intellectual development.
[more or equal to 70% and less than 80%]

3.5 Performance higer than marginal, however not totally acceptable for an adequate level of attainment for a student at a given stage of development. The 3.5 grade states that the student may give some prospective growth in the discipline but he/she need change learning methods or/and increasing learning efforts. [more or equal to 60% and less than 70%]

3.0 A marginal performance in the required exercises demonstrating a minimal passing level of attainment for a student at a given stage of development. The 3.0 grade states that the student has given no evidence of prospective growth in the discipline; an accumulation of 3.0 grades should be taken to mean that the student would be well advised not to continue in the academic field. [more than 50% and less than 60%]

2.0 For whatever reasons, an unacceptable performance. This grade indicates that the student’s performance in the required exercises has revealed almost no understanding of the course content. A grade of 2.0 should warrant questioning whether the student may suitably register for further study in the discipline before remedial work is undertaken. [less than or equal to 50%]

n/d

1. Becker, Howard Saul, and Pamela Richards. Writing for Social Scientists: How to Start and Finish Your Thesis, Book, or Article. 2nd ed. Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
2. Borja, Angel. “11 Steps to Structuring a Science Paper Editors Will Take Seriously.” Elsevier Connect, July 11, 2019. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/11-steps-to-structuring-a-science-paper-editors-will-take-seriously.

Additional literature:
1. Polak P., Trombik K., Metodyka pracy naukowej w filozofii: wprowadzenie do warsztatu cyfrowej humanistyki, Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka, 2023.
2. Heller, Michał. Jak być uczonym. Edited by Małgorzata Szczerbińska-Polak. Kraków: Znak, 2009.

Dodatkowe informacje (np. o kalendarzu rejestracji, prowadzących zajęcia, lokalizacji i terminach zajęć) mogą być dostępne w serwisie USOSweb:

• Strona przedmiotu SzD-DF>(1)Acawri-ć w USOSweb