Philosophy and Worldviews FIL-ENG-SM>WorldW
T_1 „Worldview” and „Image of the World” - definitions of the concepts
T_2 „Worldview” and Philosophy. Does Philosophical Worldview exist?
T_3 „Worldview” in Kant, Hegel and Kierkegaard
T_4 Dilthey's notion of „Worldview”
T_5 Husserl on „Worldview”
T_6 Jaspers on „Worldview”
T_7 „The Age of World Picture” – Heidegger
T_8 Wittgenstein on „Worldview”
T_9 Davidson on „Worldview”
T_10 Berger and Luckmann on „Worldview”
T_11 Derrida and Foucault on „Worldview”
T_12 „Scientific Worldview” and „Scientific Image of the World”
T_13 „Worldview” and Language
T_14 Epistemology of „Worldview”
T_15 Anthropology of „Worldview”
Koordynatorzy przedmiotu
W cyklu 2022/2023-Z: | W cyklu 2023/2024-Z: | W cyklu 2024/2025-Z: |
Efekty kształcenia
Knowledge
E_1 The student has a detailed knowledge of the distinctiveness of the subject and methodological philosophy, and also knows its place among the humanities, strict sciences and natural sciences, to the extent that it can be developed creatively on its own [K_W01].
E_2 The student has a considerable ability to identify and creatively develop philosophical problems that have grown up on the basis of: ethics and pragmatics of social life and culture and language, as well as other important philosophical disciplines [K_W08].
Skills
E_3 The student searches for, analyses, selects and integrates knowledge from written and electronic sources, and uses it creatively in formulating hypotheses and critical arguments [K_U01].
Competence
E_4 The student reconstructs and constructs the arguments from the perspective of different philosophical positions, taking into account their respective types of argumentation and recognising the similarities and differences between them [K_U12].
E_5 The student is able to present a self-defined problem and then lead a discussion about it [K_K01].
Kryteria oceniania
W_1 Examination to check the knowledge gained during the lecture
Student workload:
Lecture: 30 hours
Consultation: 10 hours
Basic reading: 30 hours
Exam preparation: 30 hours
Literatura
Basic readings:
D. Naugle, Worldview. The History of a Concept, Grand Rapids 2002.
Supplementary readings:
1. O. Pedersen, The Two Books: Historical Notes on Some Interactions between Natural Science and Theology, Notre Dame 2007.
2. M. Wildiers, The Theologian and His Universe: Theology and Cosmology from the Middle Ages to the Present, New York 1982.
3. W. McNeill, History and the Scientific Worldview, „History and Theory” 37, 1998, pp. 1-13.
4. A. Wolters, On The Idea of Worldview and Its Relation to Philosophy, In P Marshall et al (ed) Stained Glass University Press of America, 1983: pp 14-25.
5. M. Bunge, Philosophy as Worldview, w: M. Bunge, Matter and Mind, Dordrecht 2010, pp. 3-22.
6. G. Irzik, R. Nola, Worldviews and their relations to science, „Science and Education” 18, 2009, p. 729–745
7. J. Reeves, On the Relation between Science and the Scientific Worldview, „The Heythrop Journal” 54, 2013, pp. 554–562.
8. J. Carvahlo, Overview of the Structure of a Scientific Worldview, „Zygon” 41, 2006, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2006.00729.x
9. M. Orr, What is a Scientific Worldview, and how does it bear on the interplay of science and religion?, „Zygon” 41, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00748.x
Więcej informacji
Dodatkowe informacje (np. o kalendarzu rejestracji, prowadzących zajęcia, lokalizacji i terminach zajęć) mogą być dostępne w serwisie USOSweb: